Conference
Proceedings of Building Simulation 1985: 0th Conference of IBPSA
BS 1985 Seattle, Washington, USA August 21-22, 1985
List of topics
- Choosing the best tool
- Effective simulation applications
- Microcomputer techniques
- New program developments
- Panel discussion: simulation – a tool whose time has come?
- Simulation research and development
- Solar related program developments
- Successful applications
- User interface
- Validation/other research and development
Choosing the best tool
| COMPUTER MODELING OF THE BUILDING DESIGN WITH THE COMPUTER-AIDED ENGINEERING/ ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN SYSTEM |  |
| Kenneth H. Crawford | |
| DEVELOPMENT OF AN EVALUATION PROCEDURE FOR BUILDING ENERGY DESIGN | |
| Alexander J. Willman | |
| VECTOR DIAGRAM FOR THERMAL ECONOMICS OF ENERGY CONSERVATION BUILDINGS | |
| Tetsuo Nakayama, Kanji Sakai, Hideaki Hayashi, Kiyotaka Endo | |
| DEVELOPMENT OF SIMPLIFIED DESIGN TOOL USING A NEW APPROACH TO BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATIONS | |
| R. G. Derickson, M. J. Holtz | |
| ARCHITECTURAL DIVERSITY THROUGH CLIMATE RESPONSIVE DESIGN | |
| M. Stephen Zdepski | |
Effective simulation applications
| THE USE OF BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION FROM THE BUILDING OWNRES PERSPECTIVE | |
| James E. Butler | |
| BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATIONAND THE ARCHITECT | |
| Daniel H. Nall | |
| MEETING THE RESEARCHER’S NEEDS IN BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION | |
| P. Fazzio, R. Zmeureanu | |
| BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION IN THE ENGINEER’S OFFICE – A USEFUL TOOL | |
| J. Marx Ayres, Henry Lau | |
| BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION FROM THE MANUFACTURER’S PERSPECTIVE | |
| J. R. Miles | |
Microcomputer techniques
New program developments
| AN OVERVIEW OF HVACSIM+, A DYNAMIC BUILDING /HVAC/ CONTROL SYSTEMS SIMULATION PROGRAM | |
| George E. Kelly | |
| HASP/ACSS: SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR ENERGY COSUMPTION OF AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS | |
| Tatsuo Inooka | |
| NEW FEATURES OF THE DOE-2.1 C ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM | |
| W. F. Buhl, A. E. Erden, J. H. Eto, J.J. Hirsch, F. C. Winkelmann | |
| BLAST INPUT PREPROCESSORS | |
| Linda K. Lawrie | |
| MACRODYMANICS: A UNIFIELD FRAMEWORK FOR BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS | |
| Kris Subbarao | |
| THE ESP SYSTEM: TOWARDS A NEW GENERATION OF BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS PROGRAM | |
| Joe Clarke | |
Panel discussion: simulation – a tool whose time has come?
| PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE NEXT – GENERATION BUILDING ENERGY ANALYSIS COMPUTER SOFTWARE | |
| James J. Hirsch | |
| BRINGING ORDER TO THE ENERGY SIMULATION PROCESS | |
| Linda K. Lawrie | |
Simulation research and development
| SUMMARY OF RECENT ON BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION ANALYSIS IN NORTH AMERICA | |
| Tamami Kusuda | |
| RECENT DEVELOPMENTS OF BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION TOOLS IN EUROPE | |
| J. Sornay | |
| SURVEY OF SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY IN JAPAN AND ASIA | |
| Y. Matsuo | |
| SURVEY OF SIMULATION TECHNOLOGY IN AUTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND | |
| M. D. Mason, M. Sc., M.I.E. Aust., Mairah , Maas | |
Solar related program developments
| DAYLIGHTING SIMULATION IN DOE-2: THEORY, VALIDATION, AND APPLICATIONS | |
| Frederick Winkelmann | |
| THE SUNSPACE: COMPUTATION AND IN- SITU MEASURES | |
| Grattia E. | |
| PASSIVE SYSTEM SIMULATION PROGRAM ‘PSSP’ AND ITS APPLICATIONS | |
| Tetsuo Hayashi, Yoshimi Urano, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Yuji Ryu | |
| RESIDENTIAL WINDOW PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS USING REGRESSION PROCEDURES | |
| R. Sulivan, S. Selkowitz | |
| VALIDATION OF ENERGY SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR PASSIVE SOLAR HOUSE | |
| Makoto Ishizuka, kasuo Kobashi, Tadao Nakamura | |
| THE MEASURE PERFORMANCE AND COMPUTER SIMULATION OF TWO UNHEATED PASSIVE SOLAR TEST CELLS IN THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST | |
| A. F. Emery, J. L. Garbini, D. R. Heerwagen, R. D. Kunkle, C. J. Kippenhan | |
Successful applications
| ARGUING FOR ENERGY ANALYSIS – EXPERIENCE OF THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WITH ENERGY ANALYSIS DURING DESIGN | |
| Dwight A. Beranek | |
| DEMONSTRATED COST AVOIDANCE THROUGH BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATIONS AND ECONOMIC ANALYSES | |
| Steven P. Kimsey, Andrew T. Smith | |
| ENERGY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS OF DESIGN ALTERNATIVES FOR AN AN=DMINISTRATION BUILDING IN KANSAS | |
| JoAnn amber | |
| DISCOVERING THE UNEXPECTED THROUGH THE USE OF THE DOE-2.1 BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION PROGRAM | |
| Mark R. Davenport, Lung-Sing wong | |
User interface
| THE PLACE OF COMPUTER GRAPHCS IN BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION | |
| Jon H. Pittman | |
| BESA, CANADA’S SOLUTION TO THE USER INTERFACE | |
| Dan Seth | |
| REAL TIME SIMULATION IN BUILDING AUTOMATION SYSTEMS | |
| James A. Nation | |
| BUILDING SIMULATION EXTENDED – THE PROCESS CONNECTION | |
| E. C. Knipe | |
| ARTIFICIAL INTELILLIGENCE – DOES IT HAVE A PLACE IN BUILDING SIMULATION | |
| Richard N. Wright | |
Validation/other research and development
| CHARACTERIZING THE EFFECTS OF WEATHER ON COMMERCIAL BUILDING ENERGY USE | |
| Joseph H. Eto | |
| INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY BUILDING SIMULATION COMPARISON AND VALIDATION STUDY | |
| R. D. Judkoff | |
| ANALYTICAL AND EMPIRICAL VALIDATION OF DYNAMIC THERMAL BUILDING MODELS | |
| Allen E., Dave Bloomfield, Bowman N., Lomas K., allen J., Whittle J., Irving A. | |
| A COMPARATIVE VALIDATION OF THE LONG ENERGY CONSUMPTION PREDICTIONS OF FIVE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ENERGY SIMULATION PROGRAMS IN A HEATING CLIMATE | |
| Louis F. Goldberg | |
| COMPARISON OF EMPIRICALLY MEASURED END-USE METERED DATA WITH DOE 2.1 SIMULATION | |
| James A. Heidell, Z. T. Taylor | |